In re Cline

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cline

722 So. 2d 984, 1998 La. LEXIS 3125, 1998 WL 761925

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 28, 1998

DocketNo. 98-B-2319

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 So. 2d 984 (In re Cline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cline, 722 So. 2d 984, 1998 La. LEXIS 3125, 1998 WL 761925 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Cline, Leonard J.; Disciplinary Counsel LSBA; — plaintiffs); applying for findings and recommendations (formal charges/consent discipline).

ORDER

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20, it is the decision of this court that the petition for consent discipline be rejected. The case is remanded to the hearing committee for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel; recused. MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cline, Leonard J.; Disciplinary Counsel LSBA; — plaintiffs); applying for findings and recommendations (formal charges/consent discipline).

ORDER

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20, it is the decision of this court that the petition for consent discipline be rejected. The case is remanded to the hearing committee for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel; recused. MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 So. 2d 984, 1998 La. LEXIS 3125, 1998 WL 761925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cline-la-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack