In re Cline

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cline

722 So. 2d 984, 1998 La. LEXIS 3125, 1998 WL 761925

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 28, 1998·No. No. 98-B-2319·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Cline, Leonard J.; Disciplinary Counsel LSBA; — plaintiffs); applying for findings and recommendations (formal charges/consent discipline).

ORDER

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20, it is the decision of this court that the petition for consent discipline be rejected. The case is remanded to the hearing committee for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel; recused. MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cline, Leonard J.; Disciplinary Counsel LSBA; — plaintiffs); applying for findings and recommendations (formal charges/consent discipline).

ORDER

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20, it is the decision of this court that the petition for consent discipline be rejected. The case is remanded to the hearing committee for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel; recused. MARCUS, J., not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

In re Cline, 722 So. 2d 984, 1998 La. LEXIS 3125, 1998 WL 761925 (La. 1998).

Pincite

722 So. 2d 984 (In re Cline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related