in Re Clifford James Guynes

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 2006
Docket01-06-00223-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Clifford James Guynes (in Re Clifford James Guynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Clifford James Guynes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 31, 2006





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-06-00223-CR


IN RE CLIFFORD JAMES GUYNES, Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Relator requests that this Court compel respondent to enter a nunc pro tunc order for credit for jail time served. Relator contends that he is entitled to jail time credit that he demanded from respondent and that respondent refused.

               We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We first observe that the granting of credit for jail time has historically been accomplished by post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. P. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2005); Ex parte Dunn, 976 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

                Additionally, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition does not certify that a copy was served on respondent. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 52.3(j).

               The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.

               It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM


Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Keyes, and Hanks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Dunn
976 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Clifford James Guynes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clifford-james-guynes-texapp-2006.