in Re Clifford James Guynes
This text of in Re Clifford James Guynes (in Re Clifford James Guynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 31, 2006
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-06-00223-CR
IN RE CLIFFORD JAMES GUYNES, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator requests that this Court compel respondent to enter a nunc pro tunc order for credit for jail time served. Relator contends that he is entitled to jail time credit that he demanded from respondent and that respondent refused.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We first observe that the granting of credit for jail time has historically been accomplished by post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. P. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2005); Ex parte Dunn, 976 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).
Additionally, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition does not certify that a copy was served on respondent. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5, 52.3(j).
The petition for writ of mandamus is therefore denied.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Keyes, and Hanks.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Clifford James Guynes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clifford-james-guynes-texapp-2006.