In re Clifford J.

238 A.D.2d 244, 656 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 244 (In re Clifford J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Clifford J., 238 A.D.2d 244, 656 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered on or about August 15, 1995, which denied appellant’s motion to vacate an order, entered on or about July 24, 1995 on her default, extending the placement of appellant’s child with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of 12 months, effective April 6, 1995, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The order extending the placement of appellant mother’s child with the Commissioner of Social Services, which appellant seeks to vacate on this appeal, expired by its terms on April 6, 1996 and was superseded by an order, entered April 15, 1996, awarding custody of the child to his maternal grandmother, with appellant’s consent, and discharging the child from foster care, rendering the appeal moot (see, Matter of F. Children, 199 AD2d 81; Matter of Tanya M., 207 AD2d 656). In any event, were we to address the merits, we would note appellant’s history of nonattendance at prior court proceedings, including sessions of both the fact-finding and dispositional hearings, and find that her nonappearance on the extension motion, which had been adjourned two months for a hearing at her request, was willful (Family Ct Act § 1042; see, Matter of Male J., 214 AD2d 417). Appellant offered no explanation why the unspecified documents she needed to collect for purposes of the hearing could not have been collected earlier than the morning of the hearing, or any proof of a subway delay that caused her to be late for the hearing. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moncion v. AA Maintenance Enter. Inc.
72 Misc. 3d 142(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
In re Samantha B.
72 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Brianna M.
71 A.D.3d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Lashina P.
52 A.D.3d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Sephaniah A.
45 A.D.3d 386 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Pearl M.
44 A.D.3d 348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Brian H.
25 A.D.3d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re Shawntell P.
292 A.D.2d 199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D.2d 244, 656 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clifford-j-nyappdiv-1997.