In re Cleveland's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

In re Cleveland's Estate

158 N.Y.S. 1099

DecidedMay 14, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 158 N.Y.S. 1099 (In re Cleveland's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cleveland's Estate, 158 N.Y.S. 1099 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

COHALAN, S.

This is an appeal by the state comptroller from the transfer tax appraiser’s report and the order entered thereon, in that the appraiser erred in exempting from taxation the transfer of certain securities.

The appellant’s contention is based on two grounds: (1) That the [1100]*1100gift was not inter vivas, but was made in contemplation of death, and hence was taxable; and (2) that, as the transfer of the securities was not attested by stock transfer tax stamps, it cannot be regarded as a valid transfer. The proof offered concerning the gift is both sufficient and of a character to entitle it to be classed as one inter vivas. Matter of Hendricks, 163 App. Div. 413, 148 N. Y. Supp. 511, affirmed by Court of Appeals, 214 N. Y. 613, 108 N. E. 1095.

[1, 2] As to the test applied by reason of the Stock Transfer Act, there is not sufficient proof on the record to show that the transfer was not accompanied by the imposition of stamps upon the securities. Moreover, if proper proof on this point had been produced, an objection to the reception of evidence as to the transfer would have been tenable. Matter of Ball, 161 App. Div. 87, 146 N. Y. Supp. 499. No objection of this kind was noted. I therefore find that the transfer of the said securities by the decedent to Jessie (Botts) Kenyon was a gift inter vivas, and, being such, was not liable for a transfer tax.

The appeal is dismissed, and the order fixing tax affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COHALAN, S.

This is an appeal by the state comptroller from the transfer tax appraiser’s report and the order entered thereon, in that the appraiser erred in exempting from taxation the transfer of certain securities.

The appellant’s contention is based on two grounds: (1) That the [1100]*1100gift was not inter vivas, but was made in contemplation of death, and hence was taxable; and (2) that, as the transfer of the securities was not attested by stock transfer tax stamps, it cannot be regarded as a valid transfer. The proof offered concerning the gift is both sufficient and of a character to entitle it to be classed as one inter vivas. Matter of Hendricks, 163 App. Div. 413, 148 N. Y. Supp. 511, affirmed by Court of Appeals, 214 N. Y. 613, 108 N. E. 1095.

[1, 2] As to the test applied by reason of the Stock Transfer Act, there is not sufficient proof on the record to show that the transfer was not accompanied by the imposition of stamps upon the securities. Moreover, if proper proof on this point had been produced, an objection to the reception of evidence as to the transfer would have been tenable. Matter of Ball, 161 App. Div. 87, 146 N. Y. Supp. 499. No objection of this kind was noted. I therefore find that the transfer of the said securities by the decedent to Jessie (Botts) Kenyon was a gift inter vivas, and, being such, was not liable for a transfer tax.

The appeal is dismissed, and the order fixing tax affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 N.Y.S. 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clevelands-estate-nysurct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack