in Re Cleo Bustamante, Jr.
This text of in Re Cleo Bustamante, Jr. (in Re Cleo Bustamante, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 27, 2016
No. 04-16-00333-CV
IN RE Cleo BUSTAMANTE, Jr.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On May 26, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than June 20, 2016. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relator’s request for emergency relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in the trial court on this matter are stayed pending final resolution of the petition filed in this court.
It is so ORDERED on May 27, 2016.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-05-27517, styled Roberto Fernandez and Maria Imelda Flores v. Abaco Consultants, Inc., et al, pending in the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Cleo Bustamante, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cleo-bustamante-jr-texapp-2016.