In re: Clemmons v.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 1, 2001·No. 00-3941·Published

Opinion

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS

81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

,QUH0,&+$(/ $ ; &/(00216  0RYDQW   1R  !  1 2QDQ$SSOLFDWLRQIRU$XWKRUL]DWLRQWR)LOHD6HFRQGRU 6XFFHVVLYH0RWLRQXQGHU86&† 1Rn6DQGUD6%HFNZLWK'LVWULFWsXGJH $UJXHG0D\ 'HFLGHGDQG)LOHG$XJXVW %HIRUHs21(66,/(5DQG*,/0$1&LUFXLWsXGJHV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &2816(/ $5*8('  6WHYHQ / /DQH .,1*  63$/',1* :DVKLQJWRQ '& IRU $SSHOODQW  7HUU\ /HKPDQQ $66,67$1781,7('67$7(6$77251(<&LQFLQQDWL 2KLRIRU8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD21%5,()6WHYHQ/ /DQH.,1* 63$/',1*:DVKLQJWRQ'&IRU$SSHOODQW 7HUU\ /HKPDQQ $66,67$17 81,7(' 67$7(6 $77251(<&LQFLQQDWL2KLRIRU8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD

  ,QUH&OHPPRQV 1R 1R ,QUH&OHPPRQV 

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB $VWKH6XSUHPH&RXUWKDVQRWKHOGWKDW$SSUHQGLDSSOLHV UHWURDFWLYHO\ WR FDVHV RQ FROODWHUDO UHYLHZ &OHPPRQVjV 23,1,21 VHFRQGSHWLWLRQIDLOVWRVDWLVI\WKHUHTXLUHPHQWVRI86& BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB †ˆ   6,/(5 &LUFXLW sXGJH  3UHYLRXVO\ FRQYLFWHG RI D GUXJ $33/,&$7,21'(1,(' FRQVSLUDF\ LQYROYLQJ FRFDLQH DQG FRFDLQH EDVH 0RYDQW 0LFKDHO $ &OHPPRQV VHHNV SHUPLVVLRQ WR ILOH D VHFRQG PRWLRQ WR YDFDWH XQGHU  86& ††  DQG   +H DVVHUWV WKDW WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW YLRODWHG KLV ULJKWV XQGHU $SSUHQGL Y 1HZ sHUVH\  6&W    ZKHQ LW UDWKHU WKDQ WKH MXU\ GHWHUPLQHG WKH DPRXQW RI GUXJV DWWULEXWDEOHWRKLPIRUVHQWHQFLQJ&OHPPRQVFRQWHQGVWKDW KHFDQSUHVHQWDSULPDIDFLHFDVHWKDW$SSUHQGLLVmDQHZUXOH RIFRQVWLWXWLRQDOODZPDGHUHWURDFWLYHWRFDVHVRQFROODWHUDO UHYLHZ E\ WKH 6XSUHPH &RXUW WKDW ZDV SUHYLRXVO\ XQDYDLODEOHl WR KLP DQG XUJHV WKLV FRXUW WR DSSURYH KLV DSSOLFDWLRQ IRU SHUPLVVLRQ WR ILOH D VHFRQG RU VXFFHVVLYH SHWLWLRQ86&†ˆ   6XSS VHHDOVR 86& †  E  &  6XSS    :H '(1< KLV DSSOLFDWLRQEDVHGRQ7\OHUY&DLQ6&W   ,%$&.*5281' 8QGHU WKH  RQHFRXQW LQGLFWPHQW &OHPPRQV ZDV FKDUJHG ZLWK SDUWLFLSDWLQJ LQ D GUXJ FRQVSLUDF\ LQYROYLQJ XQGHU †   ,Q UH 7DWXP  )G   WK &LU  GHQ\LQJ PRUHWKDQJUDPVRIFRFDLQHDQGRUPRUHWKDQILYHJUDPV WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI $SSUHQGL WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU †  

RI FRFDLQH EDVH LQ YLRODWLRQ RI  86& ††  D   7DOERWW Y ,QGLDQD  )G   WK &LU  GHFODULQJ WKDW

 E  % LL  E  % LLL DQG&OHPPRQVDQG ††  E  $ DQG  ˆ   GHSDUW IURP SUH ODZ LH 7HDJXH E\ VSHFLI\LQJ WKDW RQO\ WKH 6XSUHPH &RXUW PDNHV WKH GHFLVLRQ UHJDUGLQJ IRXU RWKHU GHIHQGDQWV ZHUH WULHG EHIRUH D MXU\  ,Q LWV MXU\ UHWURDFWLYLW\ WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV DQG UHMHFWLQJ WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ LQVWUXFWLRQV WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW UHYLHZHG WKH DPRXQWV RI RI $SSUHQGL  ,Q UH sRVKXD  )G   WK &LU  FRFDLQHDQGFRFDLQHEDVHVHL]HGE\WKHJRYHUQPHQWIURPWKH GHQ\LQJ WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI $SSUHQGL WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU GHIHQGDQWV DQG VWLSXODWHG E\ WKH SDUWLHV  ,Q UHJDUG WR WKH †   6XVWDFKH5LYHUD Y 8QLWHG 6WDWHV  )G   VW &LU

VWDQGDUG IRU GHWHUPLQLQJ JXLOW RQ WKH FRQVSLUDF\ FKDUJH LW  GHQ\LQJ UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI sRQHV Y 8QLWHG 6WDWHV  86    DQG $SSUHQGL WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU †   ,Q UH 6PLWK LQVWUXFWHGMXURUVWKDW  )G   WK &LU  GHQ\LQJ WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI &DJH Y /RXLVLDQD  86    WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU LI\RXILQGWKDWWKHJRYHUQPHQWKDVHVWDEOLVKHGE\SURRI †  E  $  %HQQHWW Y 8QLWHG 6WDWHV  )G   WK &LU EH\RQG D UHDVRQDEOH GRXEW WKDW RQ RU DERXW WKH GDWHV  GHQ\LQJ WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI 5LJJLQV Y 1HYDGD  86    WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU †   ,Q UH 9LDO  )G   WK &LU  HQ EDQF GHQ\LQJ WKH UHWURDFWLYH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI %DLOH\ Y 8QLWHG 6WDWHV  86    WR FROODWHUDO FDVHV XQGHU  7KH LQGLFWPHQW LGHQWLILHV WKH PRYDQW DV 0LFKDHO &OHPRQV †    ,QUH&OHPPRQV 1R 1R ,QUH&OHPPRQV 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Clemmons v., (6th Cir. 2001).

In re: Clemmons v. (In re: Clemmons v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.