In re Clement

59 Misc. 367, 112 N.Y.S. 337
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Foote, J.

The preliminary objection by the defendant, that this proceeding cannot be maintained because begun more than thirty days after the surrender by the defendant of his liquor tax certificate for cancellation, is overruled; and the trial of the issues raised by the defendant’s answer is ordered to be had at a Special Term appointed to be held at the court-house in the city of Rochester, FT. Y., on Saturday, February 1, 190-8, at 11 o’clock in the forenoon.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clement, 59 Misc. 367, 112 N.Y.S. 337 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

59 Misc. 367 (In re Clement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clement v. Viscosi
63 Misc. 514 (New York County Courts, 1909)