In re Cleary

Supreme Court of Arkansas

In re Cleary

870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 737, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 68

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 7, 1994·No. CR 94-67·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Cornelius Cleary, by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Cornelius Cleary, by his attorney, John L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

In re Cleary, 870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 737, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 68 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

870 S.W.2d 394 (In re Cleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related