In re Clausen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Clausen

162 A.3d 1073, 229 N.J. 387, 2017 WL 2665972, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 684

DecidedJune 21, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.3d 1073 (In re Clausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Clausen, 162 A.3d 1073, 229 N.J. 387, 2017 WL 2665972, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 684 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-213, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f) (default by respondent), that PAUL F. CLAUSEN of CLINTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL F. CLAUSEN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-213, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f) (default by respondent), that PAUL F. CLAUSEN of CLINTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(b)(failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PAUL F. CLAUSEN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.3d 1073, 229 N.J. 387, 2017 WL 2665972, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clausen-nj-2017.