In re Clarke

780 S.E.2d 262, 414 S.C. 578, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 415
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 2, 2015
DocketAppellate Case No. 2015-000268; No. 2015-000268
StatusPublished

This text of 780 S.E.2d 262 (In re Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Clarke, 780 S.E.2d 262, 414 S.C. 578, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 415 (S.C. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

In 1985, the Court disbarred petitioner from the practice of law in South Carolina. In the Matter of Clarke, 290 S.C. 494, 351 S.E.2d 573 (1986). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Readmission pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). The Court grants the Petition for Readmission. The Office of Bar Admissions shall schedule petitioner to be readmitted during the next regularly-scheduled swearing-in ceremony.

Until such time as he has been readmitted to the practice of law, petitioner is under a continuing obligation to keep his bar application current and must update responses whenever there is an addition to or a change to information previously filed with the Clerk of Court. See Rule 402(d)(2), SCACR. Petitioner shall further notify the Clerk of Court if there are any changes to his Petition for Readmission.

s/Jean H. Toal, J.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, J.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Clarke
351 S.E.2d 573 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 S.E.2d 262, 414 S.C. 578, 2015 S.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clarke-sc-2015.