In re Clark

137 S. Ct. 2260, 198 L. Ed. 2d 694, 2017 WL 2507379, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3795
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 12, 2017
DocketNo. D–2977.
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S. Ct. 2260 (In re Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Clark, 137 S. Ct. 2260, 198 L. Ed. 2d 694, 2017 WL 2507379, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3795 (U.S. 2017).

Opinion

Thomas Andrew Clark, of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S. Ct. 2260, 198 L. Ed. 2d 694, 2017 WL 2507379, 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clark-scotus-2017.