In re Clark

249 A.D. 845, 293 N.Y.S. 30, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9970

Opinion

In a proceeding brought by the surviving spouse for the determination of the validity and effect of her election to take her intestate share against the provisions of the decedent’s will, decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. We are of opinion that the addition of subdivision (h) to section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law (Laws of 1936, chap. 234, in effect April 3, 1936) did not deprive the respondent, the surviving spouse, of her right of election against a will, exercised prior to the amendment, which will, in part at least, is coneededly within the contemplation of the decision in Matter of Curley (245 App. Div. 255; affd., 269 N. Y. 548). (Matter of Bommer, 159 Misc. 511.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Johnston, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clark, 249 A.D. 845, 293 N.Y.S. 30, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

249 A.D. 845 (In re Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Will of Curley
199 N.E. 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
In re Curley
245 A.D. 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
In re the Estate of Bommer
159 Misc. 511 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)