In re Clark

635 A.2d 505, 134 N.J. 522, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1301
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 10, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 635 A.2d 505 (In re Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Clark, 635 A.2d 505, 134 N.J. 522, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1301 (N.J. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court recommending that WALTER D. CLARK, formerly of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, and who was temporarily suspended from practice on April 24, 1991, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred for the abandonment of his law practice and his misconduct in the handling of six matters, which included gross negligence (RPC 1.1(a)), a pattern of neglect (RPC 1.1(b)), lack of diligence (RPC 1.3), failure to communicate (RPC 1.4), conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice (RPC 8.4(d)) and failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities (RPC 8.1(b));

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WALTER D. CLARK be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics shall take such protective action pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(c) as it deems appropriate, including the transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by WALTER D. CLARK, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of April 24, 1991, and it is further

[523]*523ORDERED that WALTER D. CLARK be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that WALTER D. CLARK comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that WALTER D. CLARK reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Kantor
850 A.2d 473 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 A.2d 505, 134 N.J. 522, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clark-nj-1993.