In re Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Clark

137 So. 3d 11, 2014 WL 1343270, 2014 La. LEXIS 762

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 4, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-B-0518

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 3d 11 (In re Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Clark, 137 So. 3d 11, 2014 WL 1343270, 2014 La. LEXIS 762 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, and failed to promptly refund an unearned fee. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent refunded the fee and thereafter she and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Sonceree Smith Clark, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19275, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to communicate with a client, and failed to promptly refund an unearned fee. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent refunded the fee and thereafter she and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Sonceree Smith Clark, Louisiana Bar Roll number 19275, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 3d 11, 2014 WL 1343270, 2014 La. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clark-la-2014.