In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2025·No. 04-25-00655-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00655-CR

IN RE Clarence MCFARLIN Jr.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On October 13, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator did not request a stay of proceedings in the underlying matter but does challenge the legitimacy of a competency jury trial scheduled for October 15, 2025. Relator’s petition indicates that he has not attempted service of the petition for writ of mandamus on any interested parties. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC-2024-CR-6185, styled The State of Texas v. Clarence McFarlin Jr., pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Del Prado presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00655-CR

IN RE Clarence MCFARLIN Jr.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On October 13, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator did not request a stay of proceedings in the underlying matter but does challenge the legitimacy of a competency jury trial scheduled for October 15, 2025. Relator’s petition indicates that he has not attempted service of the petition for writ of mandamus on any interested parties. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC-2024-CR-6185, styled The State of Texas v. Clarence McFarlin Jr., pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Del Prado presiding.

In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas (In Re Clarence McFarlin Jr. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.