in Re Clarence Johnson
This text of in Re Clarence Johnson (in Re Clarence Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2008.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-08-00249-CV
IN RE CLARENCE JOHNSON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On April 1, 2008, relator, Clarence Johnson, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from jail. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221(d) (Vernon 2004); Tex. R. App. P. 52.
In a habeas corpus proceeding, a relator bears the burden of showing his entitlement to relief. Ex parte Occhipenti, 796 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1990, orig. proceeding). Relator has not sustained his burden and shown that he is entitled to relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of habeas corpus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 4, 2008.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Frost, and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Clarence Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clarence-johnson-texapp-2008.