In re Clancy

247 A.D. 746

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 80 of the Public Officers Law appellant was directed to deliver to respondent, as supervisor of the town of New Windsor, Orange county, all books and papers, money and property belonging or appertaining to the office of supervisor. Order affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. (People ex rel. Miller v. Mynderse, 140 App. Div. 789; affd., 201 N. Y. 524.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents and votes to reverse on authority of People v. Purdy (154 N. Y. 439).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clancy, 247 A.D. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 746 (In re Clancy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People Ex Rel. Miller v. . Mynderse
94 N.E. 1091 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
People v. . Purdy
48 N.E. 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
People ex rel. Miller v. Mynderse
140 A.D. 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)