In re Clancy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Clancy

247 A.D. 746

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 746 (In re Clancy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Clancy, 247 A.D. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 80 of the Public Officers Law appellant was directed to deliver to respondent, as supervisor of the town of New Windsor, Orange county, all books and papers, money and property belonging or appertaining to the office of supervisor. Order affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. (People ex rel. Miller v. Mynderse, 140 App. Div. 789; affd., 201 N. Y. 524.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents and votes to reverse on authority of People v. Purdy (154 N. Y. 439).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under section 80 of the Public Officers Law appellant was directed to deliver to respondent, as supervisor of the town of New Windsor, Orange county, all books and papers, money and property belonging or appertaining to the office of supervisor. Order affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. (People ex rel. Miller v. Mynderse, 140 App. Div. 789; affd., 201 N. Y. 524.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents and votes to reverse on authority of People v. Purdy (154 N. Y. 439).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clancy-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack