In re Clair

231 A.D.2d 842, 647 N.Y.S.2d 610
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 27, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 842 (In re Clair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Clair, 231 A.D.2d 842, 647 N.Y.S.2d 610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this adoption proceeding, the biological father of the child contends that Family Court erred in dispensing with his consent to the child’s adoption by the biological mother and her present husband on the ground of abandonment pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a). We disagree. The proof establishes that the biological father evinced an intent to forego his parental rights and obligations by his failure for a period of six months to contact or communicate with the child or her mother although able to do so (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; Matter of Amanda, 197 AD2d 923, lv denied 82 NY2d 662). Furthermore, his incarceration does not excuse his failure to contact or communicate with the child (see, Matter of Amanda, supra). Lastly, the proof does not show that the biological father attempted to contact or communicate with the child and that his efforts to do so were thwarted or met with interference (cf., Matter of Shawn P., 187 AD2d 432, 433). (Appeal [843]*843from Order of Ontario County Family Court, Henry, Jr., J.— Adoption.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Daniel OO. (William BB.--Faith OO.)
2021 NY Slip Op 07326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Qwin L. X. P. (Leonard P.)
2018 NY Slip Op 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In re Kathleen H.
39 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Ashley P.
31 A.D.3d 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
In re the Adoption of Kate M.K.
23 A.D.3d 1149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re the Adoption of Madeline S.
3 A.D.3d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Joshua II.
296 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Adoption of Anonymous
191 Misc. 2d 366 (NYC Family Court, 2002)
In re Adoption of a Child Whose First Name is Damien
281 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Adoption of Hayley
190 Misc. 2d 764 (NYC Family Court, 2000)
In re B. Joanne V.
266 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re Joseph
261 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D.2d 842, 647 N.Y.S.2d 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clair-nyappdiv-1996.