In re Claim of Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Claim of Rabinowitz

16 A.D.2d 726, 226 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10340

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 726 (In re Claim of Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Claim of Rabinowitz, 16 A.D.2d 726, 226 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held her ineligible for benefits on the ground of her refusal of employment without good cause. (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2.) Her previous employment was as a bookkeeper at $85 per week but she refused the offer of a similar job at a larger salary, stating that she did not wish to work in a store and would not work in the particular location of that store. (It was also noted, though not as predicative of the decision, that she subsequently refused similar job offers, one with an importing concern and one in a supermarket.) Later, she advanced, as an additional reason for refusal, the contention that had she applied for the job she would have been asked for references and that, for personal reasons, one or more previous employers would not have recommended her; but it was shown that when claimant subsequently applied for and obtained work, her last previous employer furnished a favorable recommendation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held her ineligible for benefits on the ground of her refusal of employment without good cause. (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2.) Her previous employment was as a bookkeeper at $85 per week but she refused the offer of a similar job at a larger salary, stating that she did not wish to work in a store and would not work in the particular location of that store. (It was also noted, though not as predicative of the decision, that she subsequently refused similar job offers, one with an importing concern and one in a supermarket.) Later, she advanced, as an additional reason for refusal, the contention that had she applied for the job she would have been asked for references and that, for personal reasons, one or more previous employers would not have recommended her; but it was shown that when claimant subsequently applied for and obtained work, her last previous employer furnished a favorable recommendation. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 726, 226 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-claim-of-rabinowitz-nyappdiv-1962.