In re C.J.B.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re C.J.B.

2009 Ohio 1515, 904 N.E.2d 537, 121 Ohio St. 3d 361

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 7, 2009

Docket2008-2278

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 1515 (In re C.J.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re C.J.B., 2009 Ohio 1515, 904 N.E.2d 537, 121 Ohio St. 3d 361 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471, to the extent the court of appeals held that Juv.R. 29 does not apply to probation revocation hearings. The cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re L.A.B.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471, to the extent the court of appeals held that Juv.R. 29 does not apply to probation revocation hearings. The cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re L.A.B.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 1515, 904 N.E.2d 537, 121 Ohio St. 3d 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cjb-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack