In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency

32 A.D.3d 1338, 821 N.Y.S.2d 517
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 A.D.3d 168
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2006·No. Appeal No. 7·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V Centra, J.), entered May 12, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 4. The order, among other things, denied the motion of respondent DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. to dismiss the petition, granted the petition and authorized petitioner to acquire by condemnation certain Carousel Center interests of that respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc. — Carousel Ctr. Co., L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]).

All concur except Hurlbutt, J.P., who dissents and votes to reverse in accordance with the same dissenting memorandum as in Matter of City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency (J.C. Penney Corp., Inc. — Carousel Ctr. Co., L.P.) (32 AD3d 1332 [2006]). Present — Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, 32 A.D.3d 1338, 821 N.Y.S.2d 517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

32 A.D.3d 1338 (In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency
32 A.D.3d 1332 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)