Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re City of Rochester

In re City of Rochester

243 A.D. 683
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of Rochester. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 A.D. 583 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying city’s motion for discontinuance affirmed, without costs. Order requiring commission to convene modified by directing commissioners to convene only upon notice and after appointment of a third commissioner by the Special Term, and as modified affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The proceeding was brought to condemn property for city uses.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re City of Rochester, 243 A.D. 683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 683 (In re City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.