Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re City of Rochester

In re City of Rochester

243 A.D. 683
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 683 (In re City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re City of Rochester, 243 A.D. 683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order denying city’s motion for discontinuance affirmed, without costs. Order requiring commission to convene modified by directing commissioners to convene only upon notice and after appointment of a third commissioner by the Special Term, and as modified affirmed, without costs. All concur. (The proceeding was brought to condemn property for city uses.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1935.