In re City of New York

10 A.D.2d 865, 199 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 A.D.2d 153

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from so much of the third and last separate and final decree as contains awards for damage parcels 32, 33, and 34. Decree insofar as appealed from reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for the limited purpose of making a decision pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. It would be helpful to a final determination of the issues if the Special Term would make a new decision to include specific findings as to the sums allowed for direct taking, consequential damage, and for fixtures, together with an indication as to which items were held to constitute fixtures. (Matter of City of New York [Whitlock Ave.], 278 N. Y. 276, 283; Matter of Board of Transp., 254 App. Div. 576, 577.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re City of New York, 10 A.D.2d 865, 199 N.Y.S.2d 915, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 865 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of City of New York (Whitlock Ave.)
16 N.E.2d 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
In re the Board of Transportation
254 A.D. 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)