In re City of New York
3 A.D.2d 700, 159 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6466
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 286 A.D. 1087 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 1957·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed and the application granted. Upon the record before us, the city possessed at most a liquidated claim against the owner of the fund. The attorney’s lien of appellant, as between him and his client, was in the nature of an equitable assignment and was superior to and took precedence over the claim of the city for unpaid sales taxes. Settle order on notice. Concur—-Peck, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re City of New York, 3 A.D.2d 700, 159 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
3 A.D.2d 700 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.