In re City of New York

252 A.D. 750, 298 N.Y.S. 1003, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 A.D. 392

Opinion

Motions of Diederich, Kisslings and The National City Bank of New York for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See 251 App. Div. 669.] The following questions are certified: 1. In this condemnation proceeding, is the mortgagee entitled to a direct award based on the unincumbered fee value of the land taken, without considering the value of the part of the mortgaged premises not taken? 2. Should the award to the mortgagee be limited to the amount by which his security has been impaired by the taking? Present — Hagarty; Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re City of New York, 252 A.D. 750, 298 N.Y.S. 1003, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 750 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re The City of New York
251 A.D. 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)