In re City of New York
209 A.D. 828
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D. 269 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. We hold that the grant to Lancaster Symes does not extend beyond the line of high-water mark on Staten Island. Present—Rich, Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re City of New York, 209 A.D. 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
209 A.D. 828 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.