In re City of New York
138 A.D. 899, 123 N.Y.S. 376
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Hotice of this application must be given to all those who appear from the record to be entitled to any part of this award, which would'.include the other heirs at law or next of kin of Dugan, to whom the award was made, and the mortgagees who are entitled to receive a portion of the proceeds. The papers are irregular in not containing a certificate of the chamberlain that the amount of the award has been deposited with him. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Motion denied, with leave to renew.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re City of New York, 138 A.D. 899, 123 N.Y.S. 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
138 A.D. 899 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re City of New York
126 N.Y.S. 1124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)