In re City of Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re City of Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency

309 A.D.2d 860, 766 N.Y.S.2d 85, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 309 A.D.2d 860 (In re City of Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re City of Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, 309 A.D.2d 860, 766 N.Y.S.2d 85, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 4, the Town of Pelham, the Village of Pelham, the Pelham Union Free School District, and the Village of Pelham Manor appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered July 5, 2002, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Although the appellants, nonparties to this proceeding, served what purported to lie answers to the petition, they declined to intervene despite being invited to do so by the [861]*861Supreme Court. In light of that failure, they cannot now be heard to complain as to an outcome they believe to be adverse to them, and we decline to reach their remaining contentions (cf. Triangle Pac. Bldg. Prods. Corp. v National Bank of N. Am., 62 AD2d 1017 [1978]; Citibank v Island Fed. Credit Union, 190 Misc 2d 694, 695 [2001]; see generally CPLR 1001, 1002, 1012, 1013, 5511). Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 4, the Town of Pelham, the Village of Pelham, the Pelham Union Free School District, and the Village of Pelham Manor appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered July 5, 2002, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Although the appellants, nonparties to this proceeding, served what purported to lie answers to the petition, they declined to intervene despite being invited to do so by the [861]*861Supreme Court. In light of that failure, they cannot now be heard to complain as to an outcome they believe to be adverse to them, and we decline to reach their remaining contentions (cf. Triangle Pac. Bldg. Prods. Corp. v National Bank of N. Am., 62 AD2d 1017 [1978]; Citibank v Island Fed. Credit Union, 190 Misc 2d 694, 695 [2001]; see generally CPLR 1001, 1002, 1012, 1013, 5511). Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 860, 766 N.Y.S.2d 85, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-city-of-mount-vernon-industrial-development-agency-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack