In re City of Middletown

16 N.Y.S. 464, 21 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 201, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 547
CourtNew York County Courts
DecidedOctober 22, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 464 (In re City of Middletown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re City of Middletown, 16 N.Y.S. 464, 21 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 201, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 547 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Beattie, J.

The statute forbids a judge from sitting or taking part in the decision of any case or matter if he is related by consanguinity or affinity to any party to the controversy within the sixth degree. Code, § 46. The statute is simply an extension of the common-law maxim, that “no man can be judge in his own case.” Broom, Leg. Max. 109. It is true that ordinarily the statute applies solely to judges eo nomine. People v. Wheeler, 21 N. Y. 86; People v. Mayor, 63 N. Y. 291. It has been held, however, “that where the persons are not judges or justices in name, then the inquiry is whether they are acting judicially in the proper sense; that is, whether they are substantially a court.” Foot v. Stiles, 57 N. Y. 407. The commissioners appointed in this matter are officers created by the constitution. In re Ryers, 72 N. Y. 1. Any attempt by the legislature to vest in any other court or tribunal the authority given to such commissioners would be unconstitutional. In re Village of Middletown, 82 N. Y. 196. The commissioners are public officers appointed to discharge important judicial functions. They are to hear the parties, take evidence, and make determinations. In re Kendall, 85 N. Y. 302; Foot v. Stiles, 57 N. Y. 407. It is positively alleged in the moving affidavit that A. Y. Boak has a partnership interest in the lands affected by this proceeding. The allegation is not denied. It follows, therefore, that as the copartners of A. V. Boak are parties to the proceeding, because of their interest in the lands, he is also a party. It is conceded that Mr. Boak and Mr. Wiggins married sisters. They are therefore related to each other within the degree named in the statute. Paddoek v. Wells, 2 Barb. Ch. 332. The rights of the public and of individuals are dependent upon the regularity and validity of such proceedings. I think the objection would be fatal to any determination of the commissioners, and a commissioner should be appointed in the place of Mr. Wiggins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foot v. . Stiles
57 N.Y. 399 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)
People Ex Rel. Howlett v. Mayor & Common Council
63 N.Y. 291 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Matter of Ryers
72 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
In the Matter, Etc., Village of Middletown
82 N.Y. 196 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
In the Matter of the Petition of Kendall
85 N.Y. 302 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.Y.S. 464, 21 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 201, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-city-of-middletown-nycountyct-1891.