In Re City of Houston v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re City of Houston v. the State of Texas (In Re City of Houston v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to Stay Denied; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed March 15, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00193-CV
IN RE CITY OF HOUSTON, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-10130
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Thursday, March 14, 2024, relator City of Houston filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kristen Brauchle Hawkins, presiding judge of the 11th District Court of Harris County to observe an automatic stay it says was triggered when it filed a notice of interlocutory appeal under Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 51.014(a)(8). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.014(a)(8); .014(b). In addition, on Thursday March 14, 2024, relator asked this court to require Judge Hawkins to stay all proceedings until this original proceeding and related interlocutory appeal were resolved. The trial court has not ruled on the plea to jurisdiction. Thus, the notice of interlocutory appeal is premature, and the automatic stay is not in effect. The petition for a writ of mandamus and the motion to stay are denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Hassan, Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re City of Houston v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-city-of-houston-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.