in Re Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 28, 2022·No. 13-22-00598-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-22-00598-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION D/B/A CIRRUS AIRCRAFT

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva Order Per Curiam

On December 27, 2022, relator Cirrus Design Corporation d/b/a Cirrus Aircraft

(Cirrus) filed a petition for writ of mandamus contending that the trial court abused its

discretion by (1) issuing a “Sharing Protective Order,” and (2) requiring relator to respond

to requests for production. We request the real parties in interest, Scott Carrol Jorgenson,

individually and as representative of the estate of Carrol Vester Jorgenson, or any others

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, such as Armando Lopez,

Terry Lopez, and Armando Lopez and Terry Lopez as next friends of A.L., a minor, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days

from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of December, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft (in Re Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.