in Re Cirrus Aircraft Corporation,Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 18, 2020·No. 01-19-00996-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

proceeding to the trial court to allow the parties to finalize a settlement. On August

10, 2020, relators filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the parties have reached a

settlement.

Accordingly, we reinstate the original proceeding on the active docket and

grant relators’ motion to dismiss the cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 52.8(a).

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Adams.

number 2016-41450, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable R.K. Sandill presiding.

Footnotes

NO. 01-19-00996-CV ——————————— IN RE CIRRUS AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION D/B/A CIRRUS AIRCRAFT AND BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEM, INC., Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 19, 2019, relators, Cirrus Aircraft Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus.1 On February 13, 2020, we abated this original 1 The underlying case is Erica Falcomata and Brian Reina, Individually and On Behalf of the Estate of Russell Reina v. v. Amjad Sultan (Deceased), Air Akhtar Heating & Air Conditioning, LLC, Cirrus Aircraft Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft, and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc., cause

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion issued August 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

proceeding to the trial court to allow the parties to finalize a settlement. On August

10, 2020, relators filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the parties have reached a

settlement.

Accordingly, we reinstate the original proceeding on the active docket and

grant relators’ motion to dismiss the cause. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 52.8(a).

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Hightower and Adams.

number 2016-41450, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable R.K. Sandill presiding.

Footnotes

NO. 01-19-00996-CV ——————————— IN RE CIRRUS AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION D/B/A CIRRUS AIRCRAFT AND BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEM, INC., Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION On December 19, 2019, relators, Cirrus Aircraft Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus.1 On February 13, 2020, we abated this original 1 The underlying case is Erica Falcomata and Brian Reina, Individually and On Behalf of the Estate of Russell Reina v. v. Amjad Sultan (Deceased), Air Akhtar Heating & Air Conditioning, LLC, Cirrus Aircraft Corporation, Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft, and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc., cause

in Re Cirrus Aircraft Corporation,Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

in Re Cirrus Aircraft Corporation,Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc. (in Re Cirrus Aircraft Corporation,Cirrus Design Corporation D/B/A Cirrus Aircraft and Ballistic Recovery System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.