In re Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc.

S.D. New York

In re Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc.

205 F. Supp. 623, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3851

DecidedJune 18, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 205 F. Supp. 623 (In re Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc., 205 F. Supp. 623, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3851 (S.D.N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion by the special commissioner appointed by me. Pie moves to vacate a notice of the taking of his deposition and a subpoena duces tecum served upon him in connection therewith. The notice was issued by the petitioner herein and by the City of New York who have been adjudged liable for the damages for personal injuries caused by a collision between petitioner’s vessel and a bridge maintained by the City of New York. The stated purpose of the examination is to obtain facts and circumstances bearing upon the fairness and reasonableness of the fee which the special commissioner is asking for his services in fixing the amount of damages suffered.

The parties out of whose pockets the special commissioner’s compensation will be paid are certainly entitled to be heard on the question of its amount. For use at such a hearing they are entitled to evidence. On the other hand the special commissioner occupies, a judicial position and should be treated like a judge. If a special commissioner must contemplate harassment by a disappointed litigant he will find it difficult to decide the controversy uninfluenced by that possibility. Even if, therefore, a court has power to direct that a special commissioner submit to examination on the subject of the work for which he seeks compensation, that power should be sparingly exercised.

Another consideration which militates against inquisition of a judicial officer is the policy against attack upon judicial decisions by proof that the judge arrived at the result by some unexpressed but erroneous course of reasoning. It is true that no such attack is threatened here but the examination of the special commissioner would tend to uncover information which is in a sense privileged.

Nothing advanced by those seeking the examination leads me to feel that this ease is so exceptional as to justify the extraordinary course which the petitioner and the City of New York have adopted.

The motion is granted and the notice and subpoena set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a motion by the special commissioner appointed by me. Pie moves to vacate a notice of the taking of his deposition and a subpoena duces tecum served upon him in connection therewith. The notice was issued by the petitioner herein and by the City of New York who have been adjudged liable for the damages for personal injuries caused by a collision between petitioner’s vessel and a bridge maintained by the City of New York. The stated purpose of the examination is to obtain facts and circumstances bearing upon the fairness and reasonableness of the fee which the special commissioner is asking for his services in fixing the amount of damages suffered.

The parties out of whose pockets the special commissioner’s compensation will be paid are certainly entitled to be heard on the question of its amount. For use at such a hearing they are entitled to evidence. On the other hand the special commissioner occupies, a judicial position and should be treated like a judge. If a special commissioner must contemplate harassment by a disappointed litigant he will find it difficult to decide the controversy uninfluenced by that possibility. Even if, therefore, a court has power to direct that a special commissioner submit to examination on the subject of the work for which he seeks compensation, that power should be sparingly exercised.

Another consideration which militates against inquisition of a judicial officer is the policy against attack upon judicial decisions by proof that the judge arrived at the result by some unexpressed but erroneous course of reasoning. It is true that no such attack is threatened here but the examination of the special commissioner would tend to uncover information which is in a sense privileged.

Nothing advanced by those seeking the examination leads me to feel that this ease is so exceptional as to justify the extraordinary course which the petitioner and the City of New York have adopted.

The motion is granted and the notice and subpoena set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 F. Supp. 623, 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-circle-line-sightseeing-yachts-inc-nysd-1962.