In re Cipriano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Cipriano

901 A.2d 302, 187 N.J. 196, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1079

DecidedJuly 10, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 302 (In re Cipriano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cipriano, 901 A.2d 302, 187 N.J. 196, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1079 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-070, concluding that DENNIS A. CIPRIANO of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary for the client to make informed decisions regarding representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENNIS A. CIPRIANO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual [197]*197expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-070, concluding that DENNIS A. CIPRIANO of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary for the client to make informed decisions regarding representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DENNIS A. CIPRIANO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual [197]*197expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 302, 187 N.J. 196, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cipriano-nj-2006.