In Re Cinnamond

California Court of Appeal

In Re Cinnamond

5 P.2d 928, 119 Cal. App. 56, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 120

California Court of Appeal·Decided December 7, 1931·No. Docket No. 1647.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [1] Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. (Goodrich v.Superior Court, 92 Cal.App. 695 [268 P. 669]; Brune v.Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566].) *Page 57

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [1] Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. (Goodrich v.Superior Court, 92 Cal.App. 695 [268 P. 669]; Brune v.Superior Court, 113 Cal.App. 21 [297 P. 566].) *Page 57

In Re Cinnamond, 5 P.2d 928, 119 Cal. App. 56, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 120 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

5 P.2d 928 (In Re Cinnamond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related