In re Cinnamond

California Court of Appeal

In re Cinnamond

119 Cal. App. 56

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 7, 1931

DocketCrim. No. 1647

StatusPublished

This text of 119 Cal. App. 56 (In re Cinnamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cinnamond, 119 Cal. App. 56 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. (Goodrich v. Superior Court, 92 Cal. App. 695 [268 Pac. 669]; Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 21 [297 Pac. 566].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus. Application denied for the reason that the petitioner had failed to attach to his petition any of the record upon which the trial court acted. It will be presumed, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, that the court acted within its jurisdiction with due regard to the parties. (Goodrich v. Superior Court, 92 Cal. App. 695 [268 Pac. 669]; Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 21 [297 Pac. 566].)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 Cal. App. 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cinnamond-calctapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack