In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture

185 A.D.2d 657, 587 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9189

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly vacated and discharged the lien filed by SGB 2000, Inc. Section 5 of the Lien Law provides that, under contracts for public improvements, a lien may be filed by "[a] person performing labor for or furnishing materials to a contractor, his subcontractor or legal representative”. SGB 2000, Inc., which agreed to furnish materials to a sub-subcontractor, is too remote from the prime contractor to file a valid lien (see, Cameron Equip. Corp. v People, 31 AD2d 299, 301, affd 27 NY2d 634; Wynkoop v People, 1 AD2d 620, affd 4 NY2d 892). [658] (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. —Mechanic’s Lien.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture, 185 A.D.2d 657, 587 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

185 A.D.2d 657 (In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wynkoop v. People
4 N.Y.2d 892 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
Cameron Equipment Corp. v. People
261 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Wynkoop v. People
1 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Cameron Equipment Corp. v. People
31 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)