In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture

185 A.D.2d 657, 587 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9189

This text of 185 A.D.2d 657 (In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ciminelli-Walbridge Joint Venture, 185 A.D.2d 657, 587 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly vacated and discharged the lien filed by SGB 2000, Inc. Section 5 of the Lien Law provides that, under contracts for public improvements, a lien may be filed by "[a] person performing labor for or furnishing materials to a contractor, his subcontractor or legal representative”. SGB 2000, Inc., which agreed to furnish materials to a sub-subcontractor, is too remote from the prime contractor to file a valid lien (see, Cameron Equip. Corp. v People, 31 AD2d 299, 301, affd 27 NY2d 634; Wynkoop v People, 1 AD2d 620, affd 4 NY2d 892). [658]*658(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. —Mechanic’s Lien.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Boehm, Davis and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wynkoop v. People
4 N.Y.2d 892 (New York Court of Appeals, 1958)
Cameron Equipment Corp. v. People
261 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Wynkoop v. People
1 A.D.2d 620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Cameron Equipment Corp. v. People
31 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 657, 587 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ciminelli-walbridge-joint-venture-nyappdiv-1992.