In re Cifelli
This text of 235 A.D. 731 (In re Cifelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, -without costs, and motion for an order adjudging that the petition filed -with the village clerk of the village of Mamaroneck is invalid, illegal and insufficient, denied. We are of opinion that the petition complies in all substantial particulars with section 139-a of the Village Lawf and is, therefore, valid in requiring a submission of the resolution to a referendum in accordance with the requirements of the statute. Section 139-b of the Village Lawj: contemplates that the proposition for the submission of the referendum be prepared by the village clerk with the advice of the village attorney. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cifelli-nyappdiv-1932.