In re Chyna J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Chyna J.

14 A.D.3d 353, 786 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 79

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 14 A.D.3d 353 (In re Chyna J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Chyna J., 14 A.D.3d 353, 786 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 79 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[354]*354The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible testimony disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon M. Rand, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[354]*354The court’s finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible testimony disproved appellant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 A.D.3d 353, 786 N.Y.S.2d 744, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chyna-j-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack