In re Chulak

255 A.D.2d 761, 679 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Per Curiam.

Effective March 24, 1998, this Court reciprocally suspended respondent for a period of three months (Matter of Chulak, 251 AD2d 744). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.9) regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys and with the provisions of the order of suspension regarding reinstatement. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has not submitted papers opposing the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Chulak, 255 A.D.2d 761, 679 N.Y.S.2d 856, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 761 (In re Chulak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Lolio
274 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)