in Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett
This text of in Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett (in Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Deny and Opinion Filed February 25, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00140-CV
IN RE CHUAN CHEN AND M. TAYARI GARRETT, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17249
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court are relators’ February 22, 2022 petition for writ of
mandamus and motion for emergency stay.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relators have
failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
We deny relators’ motion for emergency stay as moot.
Page 1 of 2 220140f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Chuan Chen and M. Tayari Garrett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-chuan-chen-and-m-tayari-garrett-texapp-2022.