in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name

DecidedJuly 18, 2006

Docket13-06-00363-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name (in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-06-363-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION AND CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL KLEBERG, IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion^{^[1]}

Relators, Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in its assumed or common name, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 26, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, its record, and its sealed in camera documents, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 18th day of July, 2006.

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-06-363-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION AND CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL KLEBERG, IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion^{^[1]}

Relators, Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in its assumed or common name, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 26, 2006. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, its record, and its sealed in camera documents, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 18th day of July, 2006.

^{^[1]}See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) (AWhen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.@); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation and Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, in Its Assumed or Common Name, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christus-spohn-health-system-corporation-and-texapp-2006.