In re Christopher W.

202 A.D.2d 305, 609 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2524
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Judith Sheindlin, J.), entered November 23, 1992, which adjudged that appellant committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the first degree, and placed him in a Division for Youth facility for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The 911 tape, in which a nontestifying civilian reported the crime, was not Rosario material, notwithstanding that the non-witness was presumably relaying information from the complainant, because the tape was not a "written or recorded statement” by a testifying witness (Family Ct Act § 331.4 [1] [a]; Matter of Andrew T., 182 AD2d 630, lv denied 80 NY2d 757). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Christopher W., 202 A.D.2d 305, 609 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 305 (In re Christopher W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. Walsh
443 F. Supp. 2d 557 (S.D. New York, 2006)
People v. Rojas
29 A.D.3d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Brock
293 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Pabon
213 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Ford
211 A.D.2d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)