In Re: Christopher Torres v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 27, 2023
Docket05-23-00593-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Christopher Torres v. the State of Texas (In Re: Christopher Torres v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Christopher Torres v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

DENIED and Opinion Filed November 27, 2023

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00593-CV

IN RE CHRISTOPHER TORRES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-22-12902

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Smith In his June 13, 2023, petition for writ of mandamus, relator seeks relief from

the trial court’s May 11, 2023, order granting a motion to correct and reform the

parties’ mediated settlement agreement.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.

In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). The relator bears the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient

record to show he is entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding). Relator’s petition, however, does not comply with the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). Rule 52.7(a)(2) requires the

relator to file with the petition “a transcript of any relevant testimony from any

underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence.” Id. (emphasis

added). Here, relator filed with his petition a transcript from the relevant underlying

proceeding, but not any of the exhibits that the transcript shows were offered and

admitted into evidence at the hearing. The trial court issued the challenged order

based on its consideration of this evidence. Without the evidence’s inclusion in the

mandamus record, relator has not carried his burden.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift the stay

issued by this Court’s July 28, 2023, Order.

/Craig Smith/ CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE 230593F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Christopher Torres v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-torres-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.