In re Christopher T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christopher T.

287 A.D.2d 336, 731 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9685

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 287 A.D.2d 336 (In re Christopher T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christopher T., 287 A.D.2d 336, 731 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted sexual abuse in the third degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence. The element of intent to obtain sexual gratification could clearly be inferred from the totality of the circumstances (see, Matter of Kenny O., 276 AD2d 271, lv denied 96 NY2d 701). [337]*337His conduct was clearly sexual and cannot be characterized as “horseplay.” Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2001, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted sexual abuse in the third degree (two counts), and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence. The element of intent to obtain sexual gratification could clearly be inferred from the totality of the circumstances (see, Matter of Kenny O., 276 AD2d 271, lv denied 96 NY2d 701). [337]*337His conduct was clearly sexual and cannot be characterized as “horseplay.” Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.D.2d 336, 731 N.Y.S.2d 377, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-t-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack