in Re Christopher T. Brady
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-18-00451-CR
IN RE Christopher T. BRADY Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 18, 2018 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 5, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which it appears relator is asserting he has been detained in jail in violation of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 17.151 (“Release because of delay”). Relator asks that he be released from confinement. Relator is represented by court-appointed trial counsel below; therefore, his pro se mandamus petition presents nothing for this court’s review because a criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CR-4755, styled The State of Texas v. Christopher T. Brady, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Christopher T. Brady (in Re Christopher T. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.