in Re Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P. Kappmeyer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 14, 2021
Docket13-21-00344-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P. Kappmeyer (in Re Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P. Kappmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P. Kappmeyer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00344-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE KAPPMEYER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

On October 11, 2021, relators Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P.

Kappmeyer filed a petition for writ of mandamus through which they assert that the trial

court erred by requiring the relators to join and serve all property owners in Units-1-5 of

Key Allegro Estates in the underlying lawsuit. Relators have also filed an opposed motion

to stay the trial court’s September 21, 2021 order, and other trial court proceedings,

pending resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay, is of the

opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion to stay and we order

all trial court proceedings, including the September 21, 2021 order, to be stayed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief

is effective until the case is finally decided.”).

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Key Allegro Canal and Property

Owners’ Association, a Texas nonprofit corporation, or any others whose interest would

be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus

on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2,

52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the 14th day of October, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Christopher S. Kappmeyer and Roxana P. Kappmeyer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-s-kappmeyer-and-roxana-p-kappmeyer-texapp-2021.