In re Christopher R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christopher R.

257 A.D.2d 401, 683 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 66

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 401 (In re Christopher R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Christopher R., 257 A.D.2d 401, 683 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 66 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about November 20, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The information set forth in the anonymous tip was sufficiently specific and accurate as to the description of the car found at the specified location, as well as its occupants, to provide the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop the car and investigate (see, People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about November 20, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and placed appellant with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The information set forth in the anonymous tip was sufficiently specific and accurate as to the description of the car found at the specified location, as well as its occupants, to provide the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop the car and investigate (see, People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 401, 683 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-r-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack