In re Christopher R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christopher R.

185 A.D.2d 681, 587 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9228

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In the absence of a petition to extend placement and a showing of good cause at a hearing, as required by Family Court Act § 756-a (a), Family Court lacked jurisdiction to extend placement, even with the consent of the juvenile and his mother. That part of Family Court’s order must be vacated and the juvenile released upon the expiration of his original term of placement. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, O’Donnell, J.—Extend Placement.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In the absence of a petition to extend placement and a showing of good cause at a hearing, as required by Family Court Act § 756-a (a), Family Court lacked jurisdiction to extend placement, even with the consent of the juvenile and his mother. That part of Family Court’s order must be vacated and the juvenile released upon the expiration of his original term of placement. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, O’Donnell, J.—Extend Placement.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

In re Christopher R., 185 A.D.2d 681, 587 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

185 A.D.2d 681 (In re Christopher R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related