In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas (In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT
In re Christopher M. Perricone, * Original Mandamus Proceeding
No. 11-25-00078-CV * April 24, 2025
* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)
This court has considered Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus and concludes that the petition should be dismissed in part for want of jurisdiction and denied in part. We dismiss the portion of Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to set aside the expired temporary restraining order, and we deny the remainder of his petition. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed in part and denied in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-m-perricone-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.