In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 24, 2025·No. 11-25-00078-CV·Published

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

In re Christopher M. Perricone, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-25-00078-CV * April 24, 2025

* Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus and concludes that the petition should be dismissed in part for want of jurisdiction and denied in part. We dismiss the portion of Christopher M. Perricone’s petition for writ of mandamus that seeks to set aside the expired temporary restraining order, and we deny the remainder of his petition. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed in part and denied in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas (In Re Christopher M. Perricone v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.