in Re: Christopher Lee Cobb
This text of in Re: Christopher Lee Cobb (in Re: Christopher Lee Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-06-00027-CV
IN RE:
CHRISTOPHER LEE COBB
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In his petition for writ of mandamus, Christopher Lee Cobb sought from this Court a writ directing the trial court to disqualify Gary D. Young, County Attorney of Lamar County, performing the duties of a district attorney, who now represents the State in the pending capital murder case against Cobb, a case in which the State seeks the death penalty. While Young was in private practice, he represented Cobb on two prior occasions. Based on Young's role as Cobb's former attorney, Cobb argued that Young's participation in the prosecution deprived Cobb of his constitutional rights to due process.
Young has notified this Court that he and Cobb's current counsel, Steven R. Miears, have agreed that Young will recuse himself from this prosecution. This agreement resolves the controversy pending before this Court. Accordingly, we dismiss Cobb's petition as moot.
The stay of Cobb's trial heretofore ordered by this Court February 15, 2006, is hereby dissolved.
Donald R. Ross
Justice
Date Submitted: March 1, 2006
Date Decided: March 22, 2006
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Christopher Lee Cobb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-christopher-lee-cobb-texapp-2006.